Skip to content
Independent intelligence for people who make things.
Company moves / checked October 1, 2026

What changed for your tools—good news and bad

+ Plus: good for most readers. − Minus: costs readers something. Watch: unclear or rumored. Reported: press reports, not announced. Our tags are editorial judgments.

The China Desk · long reads

What Chinese AI minds are arguing about

All China Desk stories →
Current editions / all free

Start with a source-backed notebook, then follow the original work.

Fable / plan rules re-checked September 29, 2026

On the $20 Pro plan? Start with Opus 5.5 or Sonnet 5.5.

Fable 5.1 is Anthropic’s current Fable model. It is not included in Pro’s usage limits—on Pro it runs only on pay-as-you-go usage credits. Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5 are included, and Claude Code now defaults Pro to Opus. On Max and premium Team/Enterprise seats, Fable 5 and 5.1 are part of the plan, up to 50% of weekly limits. (The July promotion that let every plan use Fable 5 ended on July 19.) The next Fable is rumored, not announced.

Anthropic’s plan rules (opens in a new tab)
Free Brief / interest registration

A clearer view of what changed.

Selected model changes, useful projects and the conditions behind them. The first issue is a draft, not an operating newsletter. You can read the website freely and register interest in future email updates.

No paid membership is created. The first issue has not been scheduled yet. How we handle your data.

Jev / a free collection

Small decisions.
Unexpected possibilities.

Search, forms, message actions and games. See where creators put Jev to work—and which parts need more than a decision model.

Explore the Jev collection
01 / Find an idea02 / Inspect its source03 / Know its limits
Firsthand, not final truth

Voices from the frontier

All voices
Coding workflowSpeed, with a caveat

One practitioner prefers Opus 5.5 overall but reports finishing some tasks faster with Astra and Sol.

The post gives personal timing and token-efficiency impressions, not a controlled or matched task study. Replies dispute the speed claim; a complete trace is not supplied.

Project reviewA different outcome

In two unfinished projects, this builder says Astra xhigh challenged parts of an Opus 5.5 high review.

This is a self-reported review of two projects, not a matched benchmark. Prompts, diffs and independent scoring are absent; the effort settings differ.

More than the featured six

Search the full source library

Browse by task

Use task, source and topic filters to inspect the rest of the collection. Cases are dated; a historical visual is not a new-model test.

The public edition

Good ideas deserve
an open door.

Explore the Jev collection, inspect the creators’ work and choose a useful next experiment. No subscription required.

Explore Jev for free ↗